Tarelivo's free tools do one job each, with no login. The comment generator turns a video title and a little context into three draft ideas. The score checker grades a draft out of 100. The thumbnail tool downloads a video's thumbnail in four sizes. The transcript tool fetches captions as text. The download tool opens a provider frame with MP3 and MP4 options where available.
The limits are stated on each page because they matter. The generator gives three generations per day per visitor. The thumbnail tool only works for public videos, and older videos may lack the largest size. The transcript tool only works where captions exist, and auto-captions can mishear names. The download tool does not host files; the file comes from a third-party provider frame.
What the free tools never do is just as important. Nothing posts automatically. Nothing promises replies, pins, visibility, or subscriber growth. The score checker is tarelivo's heuristic, not YouTube's filter, and a high score is not a guarantee of anything except that the draft is specific, relevant, and free of common spam signals.
The monetization checker is the same shape: it computes from numbers you type in — subscribers, watch hours, Shorts views — against the thresholds on YouTube's Help page today. It cannot see your strikes, your policy status, or your AdSense account, and it is not YouTube's decision. The Earn tab in Studio is the source of truth.
The workspace is where the free tools stop and a routine starts: target channels to monitor, opportunity scoring, a review queue, scheduling for approved comments, and follow-ups when someone replies — all inside per-thread caps you set, and pausable at any time. That is the whole pitch, without the growth promises.
If a tool page ever claims more than this, treat that as a bug and tell us. The free tier of the internet is full of comment tools that promise reach; tarelivo's position is narrower on purpose: drafts you review, scores you can check, and a pace a human can defend.